I read somewhere that it's more like 7 fps than 8, but that's being pedantic. I've handled the 7D for a few moments at B&H (oblivious of the theatrical throat-clearings and discreet shoves from other gawkers), and can vouch that it's solidly built and that it's frames-per-second sounds really fast. Update (11.21.09): For another review of the 7D, check Bob Atkins' here. I am interested in the $1,700 Canon EOS 7D as a second camera to my current full-frame low-light capable 5D Mark II, and for its 8 fps capability, so I will parse every word before I make any decisions. The full comprehensive review runs to 30 pages, and is worth to read very carefully if this camera is of interest. Its 8 fps continuous shooting speed and highly flexible AF system might even make it a consideration for credit-crunch battered sports photographers on a budget." "In some respects the 7D is even a better camera than the EOS 5D Mark II and a viable alternative for all those who do not want or need a camera with a full-frame sensor. From DPReview's just published write-up on the new Canon EOS 7D has this interesting paragraph:
0 kommentar(er)
